Skip to main content

Mid 2018

33 members·6 stats

Ranking — Overall

Play VS
  • 1
    LPLLPL85
    Mechanics78Laning88Teamfighting84Macro73Consistency88Versatility99
  • 2
    LCKLCK84
    Mechanics73Laning78Teamfighting79Macro88Consistency91Versatility97
  • 3
    LCKLCK82
    Mechanics78Laning88Teamfighting69Macro64Consistency96Versatility94
  • 4
    LCKLCK82
    Mechanics87Laning90Teamfighting85Macro79Consistency75Versatility73
  • 5
    LPLLPL82
    Mechanics79Laning83Teamfighting80Macro71Consistency83Versatility97
  • 6
    LPLLPL81
    Mechanics83Laning80Teamfighting84Macro81Consistency83Versatility77
  • 7
    LCKLCK80
    Mechanics76Laning76Teamfighting89Macro76Consistency79Versatility85
  • 8
    LCKLCK80
    Mechanics83Laning71Teamfighting80Macro86Consistency85Versatility74
  • 9
    LCKLCK80
    Mechanics75Laning78Teamfighting68Macro77Consistency93Versatility90
  • 10
    LPLLPL80
    Mechanics78Laning80Teamfighting81Macro74Consistency78Versatility89
  • 11
    LCKLCK78
    Mechanics76Laning69Teamfighting78Macro90Consistency76Versatility81
  • 12
    LCKLCK78
    Mechanics79Laning85Teamfighting75Macro73Consistency91Versatility64
  • 13
    LCKLCK78
    Mechanics65Laning87Teamfighting77Macro78Consistency89Versatility74
  • 14
    LCKLCK77
    Mechanics84Laning80Teamfighting83Macro74Consistency77Versatility65
  • 15
    LPLLPL77
    Mechanics80Laning71Teamfighting82Macro64Consistency76Versatility88
  • 16
    LPLLPL77
    Mechanics69Laning78Teamfighting72Macro68Consistency81Versatility95
  • 17
    LCKLCK75
    Mechanics72Laning60Teamfighting72Macro91Consistency75Versatility82
  • 18
    LPLLPL75
    Mechanics63Laning74Teamfighting80Macro62Consistency78Versatility92
  • 19
    LPLLPL75
    Mechanics80Laning72Teamfighting84Macro66Consistency74Versatility75
  • 20
    LPLLPL75
    Mechanics77Laning72Teamfighting83Macro62Consistency72Versatility81
  • 21
    G
    LCKLCK74
    Mechanics79Laning67Teamfighting77Macro68Consistency79Versatility74
  • 22
    LCKLCK73
    Mechanics73Laning64Teamfighting85Macro75Consistency75Versatility63
  • 23
    X
    LPLLPL73
    Mechanics66Laning73Teamfighting67Macro54Consistency84Versatility93
  • 24
    LPLLPL73
    Mechanics75Laning75Teamfighting81Macro69Consistency64Versatility75
  • 25
    LPLLPL72
    Mechanics66Laning73Teamfighting64Macro75Consistency78Versatility78
  • 26
    LPLLPL72
    Mechanics66Laning73Teamfighting84Macro66Consistency72Versatility72
  • 27
    LPLLPL72
    Mechanics58Laning73Teamfighting69Macro66Consistency79Versatility87
  • 28
    LPLLPL70
    Mechanics73Laning75Teamfighting72Macro73Consistency67Versatility57
  • 29
    LPLLPL70
    Mechanics69Laning72Teamfighting81Macro58Consistency61Versatility78
  • 30
    LPLLPL69
    Mechanics65Laning75Teamfighting71Macro65Consistency69Versatility71
  • 31
    LPLLPL67
    Mechanics67Laning76Teamfighting67Macro70Consistency61Versatility60
  • 32
    LPLLPL64
    Mechanics63Laning69Teamfighting67Macro64Consistency63Versatility57
  • 33
    LPLLPL63
    Mechanics58Laning69Teamfighting70Macro60Consistency64Versatility58
Axis leaders · records

Champion per stat

Overall distribution (33 members)mean 76·median 75
6385

Hover or tap a bar to see who is in it

Mid 2018 ranking at a glance

Mid 2018 compares 33 members across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting. The overall top is RooKie, with an average of 85. In Mechanics, Faker ranks highest. The overall average here is 76, ranging from 85 down to 63.

Frequently asked questions

Who is ranked #1 in Mid 2018?
The overall #1 in Mid 2018 is RooKie, averaging 85.
How many are compared in Mid 2018?
33 entries compared across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting.
Who leads in Mechanics?
Faker leads in Mechanics.
How are these scores calculated?
Each axis is a percentile within this ranking, averaged from measured match metrics, with sample shrinkage and — for international events — anchoring to the major-league distribution and a strength-of-schedule adjustment. A rank is not a raw metric; the full method is at everystat.ai/clusters/method.

How the six-axis ratings work →