Skip to main content

LCK Jungle 2023

12 members·6 stats

Ranking — Overall

Play VS
  • 1
    86
    Mechanics85Laning88Teamfighting83Macro85Consistency94Versatility83
  • Mechanics82Laning91Teamfighting75Macro81Consistency90Versatility93
  • 3
    84
    Mechanics87Laning78Teamfighting87Macro73Consistency82Versatility97
  • Mechanics88Laning93Teamfighting69Macro76Consistency91Versatility87
  • 5
    76
    Mechanics76Laning75Teamfighting63Macro82Consistency79Versatility78
  • Mechanics73Laning81Teamfighting76Macro81Consistency75Versatility64
  • 7
    74
    Mechanics82Laning73Teamfighting92Macro74Consistency65Versatility56
  • Mechanics64Laning82Teamfighting71Macro73Consistency71Versatility80
  • Mechanics73Laning70Teamfighting67Macro82Consistency80Versatility53
  • 10
    63
    Mechanics62Laning57Teamfighting71Macro65Consistency57Versatility66
  • 11
    62
    Mechanics68Laning50Teamfighting76Macro55Consistency50Versatility70
  • 12
    62
    Mechanics59Laning60Teamfighting63Macro68Consistency62Versatility60
Axis leaders · records

Champion per stat

Overall distribution (12 members)mean 75·median 75
6286

Hover or tap a bar to see who is in it

LCK Jungle 2023 ranking at a glance

LCK Jungle 2023 compares 12 members across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting. The overall top is Cuzz, with an average of 86. In Mechanics, Peanut ranks highest. The overall average here is 75, ranging from 86 down to 62.

Frequently asked questions

Who is ranked #1 in LCK Jungle 2023?
The overall #1 in LCK Jungle 2023 is Cuzz, averaging 86.
How many are compared in LCK Jungle 2023?
12 entries compared across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting.
Who leads in Mechanics?
Peanut leads in Mechanics.
How are these scores calculated?
Each axis is a percentile within this ranking, averaged from measured match metrics, with sample shrinkage and — for international events — anchoring to the major-league distribution and a strength-of-schedule adjustment. A rank is not a raw metric; the full method is at everystat.ai/clusters/method.

How the six-axis ratings work →