Skip to main content

LPL Mid 2016

12 members·6 stats

Ranking — Overall

Play VS
  • Mechanics83Laning77Teamfighting82Macro77Consistency67Versatility74
  • 2
    77
    Mechanics71Laning71Teamfighting76Macro71Consistency77Versatility97
  • 3
    76
    Mechanics73Laning74Teamfighting73Macro74Consistency79Versatility85
  • Mechanics73Laning72Teamfighting78Macro72Consistency85Versatility73
  • Mechanics75Laning75Teamfighting69Macro75Consistency82Versatility79
  • Mechanics65Laning69Teamfighting71Macro69Consistency84Versatility89
  • 7
    74
    Mechanics79Laning74Teamfighting70Macro74Consistency67Versatility82
  • Mechanics79Laning73Teamfighting71Macro73Consistency76Versatility67
  • 9
    72
    Mechanics70Laning73Teamfighting76Macro73Consistency85Versatility54
  • 10
    70
    Mechanics75Laning72Teamfighting72Macro72Consistency69Versatility58
  • 11
    70
    Mechanics69Laning75Teamfighting78Macro75Consistency58Versatility67
  • 12
    67
    Mechanics69Laning73Teamfighting69Macro73Consistency58Versatility61
Axis leaders · records

Champion per stat

Overall distribution (12 members)mean 74·median 75
6777

Hover or tap a bar to see who is in it

LPL Mid 2016 ranking at a glance

LPL Mid 2016 compares 12 members across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting. The overall top is xiye, with an average of 77. In Mechanics, RooKie ranks highest. The overall average here is 74, ranging from 77 down to 67.

Frequently asked questions

Who is ranked #1 in LPL Mid 2016?
The overall #1 in LPL Mid 2016 is xiye, averaging 77.
How many are compared in LPL Mid 2016?
12 entries compared across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting.
Who leads in Mechanics?
RooKie leads in Mechanics.
How are these scores calculated?
Each axis is a percentile within this ranking, averaged from measured match metrics, with sample shrinkage and — for international events — anchoring to the major-league distribution and a strength-of-schedule adjustment. A rank is not a raw metric; the full method is at everystat.ai/clusters/method.

How the six-axis ratings work →