LCK
LPL
LEC
LCS
EWC
LCP
PCS
VCS
Worlds
MSIRanking — Overall
Play VSTick two checkboxes to compare them
| # | Name | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AckermanLOS | 49 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 49 | 52 | |
| 2 | JoJoFURIA | 43 | 30 | 37 | 42 | 40 | 55 | 55 | |
| 3 | frostyRED Kalunga | 40 | 41 | 43 | 28 | 49 | 38 | 41 | |
| 4 | uZentLOUD | 38 | 39 | 39 | 41 | 42 | 29 | 38 | |
| 5 | RedBertLOUD | 34 | 33 | 31 | 37 | 34 | 33 | 36 | |
| 6 | KaiwingGround Zero Gaming | 33 | 36 | 42 | 35 | 24 | 33 | 29 | |
| 7 | MomochiFluxo W7M | 32 | 37 | 22 | 28 | 37 | 43 | 26 | |
| 8 | KuripaiN Gaming | 28 | 31 | 35 | 35 | 23 | 22 | 22 |
- Mechanics48Laning48Teamfighting48Macro48Consistency49Versatility52
- Mechanics30Laning37Teamfighting42Macro40Consistency55Versatility55
- Mechanics41Laning43Teamfighting28Macro49Consistency38Versatility41
- Mechanics39Laning39Teamfighting41Macro42Consistency29Versatility38
- Mechanics33Laning31Teamfighting37Macro34Consistency33Versatility36
- Mechanics36Laning42Teamfighting35Macro24Consistency33Versatility29
- Mechanics37Laning22Teamfighting28Macro37Consistency43Versatility26
- Mechanics31Laning35Teamfighting35Macro23Consistency22Versatility22
Axis leaders · records
Champion per stat
Overall distribution (8 members)mean 37·median 38
2849
Hover or tap a bar to see who is in it
CBLOL Support 2026 ranking at a glance
CBLOL Support 2026 compares 8 members across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting. The overall top is Ackerman, with an average of 49. In Mechanics, Ackerman ranks highest. The overall average here is 37, ranging from 49 down to 28.
Frequently asked questions
- Who is ranked #1 in CBLOL Support 2026?
- The overall #1 in CBLOL Support 2026 is Ackerman, averaging 49.
- How many are compared in CBLOL Support 2026?
- 8 entries compared across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting.
- Who leads in Mechanics?
- Ackerman leads in Mechanics.
- How are these scores calculated?
- Each axis is a percentile within this ranking, averaged from measured match metrics, with sample shrinkage and — for international events — anchoring to the major-league distribution and a strength-of-schedule adjustment. A rank is not a raw metric; the full method is at everystat.ai/clusters/method.