Skip to main content

LCS Support 2014

12 members·6 stats

Ranking — Overall

Play VS
  • Mechanics45Laning69Teamfighting54Macro53Consistency59Versatility77
  • Mechanics54Laning54Teamfighting60Macro53Consistency69Versatility68
  • Mechanics74Laning34Teamfighting55Macro41Consistency62Versatility70
  • Mechanics66Laning53Teamfighting57Macro62Consistency44Versatility56
  • Mechanics55Laning62Teamfighting44Macro47Consistency59Versatility65
  • Mechanics43Laning55Teamfighting55Macro64Consistency66Versatility45
  • 7
    M
    55
    Mechanics53Laning59Teamfighting58Macro62Consistency53Versatility44
  • Mechanics61Laning57Teamfighting51Macro52Consistency42Versatility61
  • 9
    G
    53
    Mechanics46Laning47Teamfighting55Macro55Consistency64Versatility53
  • Mechanics49Laning60Teamfighting54Macro52Consistency52Versatility43
  • Mechanics55Laning53Teamfighting52Macro59Consistency38Versatility40
  • Mechanics48Laning46Teamfighting51Macro37Consistency34Versatility39
Axis leaders · records

Champion per stat

Overall distribution (12 members)mean 54·median 55
4360

Hover or tap a bar to see who is in it

LCS Support 2014 ranking at a glance

LCS Support 2014 compares 12 members across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting. The overall top is LemonNation, with an average of 60. In Mechanics, ackerman ranks highest. The overall average here is 54, ranging from 60 down to 43.

Frequently asked questions

Who is ranked #1 in LCS Support 2014?
The overall #1 in LCS Support 2014 is LemonNation, averaging 60.
How many are compared in LCS Support 2014?
12 entries compared across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting.
Who leads in Mechanics?
ackerman leads in Mechanics.
How are these scores calculated?
Each axis is a percentile within this ranking, averaged from measured match metrics, with sample shrinkage and — for international events — anchoring to the major-league distribution and a strength-of-schedule adjustment. A rank is not a raw metric; the full method is at everystat.ai/clusters/method.

How the six-axis ratings work →