Skip to main content

LCS Support 2019

12 members·6 stats

Ranking — Overall

Play VS
  • Mechanics72Laning85Teamfighting67Macro64Consistency85Versatility81
  • Mechanics49Laning70Teamfighting53Macro68Consistency67Versatility62
  • Mechanics61Laning59Teamfighting59Macro52Consistency73Versatility70
  • Mechanics58Laning40Teamfighting56Macro67Consistency52Versatility61
  • Mechanics69Laning48Teamfighting63Macro56Consistency50Versatility51
  • Mechanics44Laning49Teamfighting46Macro50Consistency64Versatility79
  • Mechanics64Laning62Teamfighting47Macro59Consistency44Versatility56
  • 8
    54
    Mechanics46Laning64Teamfighting48Macro73Consistency45Versatility49
  • 9
    52
    Mechanics65Laning47Teamfighting65Macro41Consistency49Versatility47
  • 10
    51
    Mechanics47Laning51Teamfighting59Macro50Consistency53Versatility44
  • 11
    50
    Mechanics51Laning48Teamfighting57Macro53Consistency48Versatility45
  • Mechanics44Laning53Teamfighting47Macro48Consistency50Versatility41
Axis leaders · records

Champion per stat

Overall distribution (12 members)mean 56·median 55
4776

Hover or tap a bar to see who is in it

LCS Support 2019 ranking at a glance

LCS Support 2019 compares 12 members across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting. The overall top is CoreJJ, with an average of 76. In Mechanics, CoreJJ ranks highest. The overall average here is 56, ranging from 76 down to 47.

Frequently asked questions

Who is ranked #1 in LCS Support 2019?
The overall #1 in LCS Support 2019 is CoreJJ, averaging 76.
How many are compared in LCS Support 2019?
12 entries compared across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting.
Who leads in Mechanics?
CoreJJ leads in Mechanics.
How are these scores calculated?
Each axis is a percentile within this ranking, averaged from measured match metrics, with sample shrinkage and — for international events — anchoring to the major-league distribution and a strength-of-schedule adjustment. A rank is not a raw metric; the full method is at everystat.ai/clusters/method.

How the six-axis ratings work →