LCK
LPL
LEC
Worlds
MSIRanking — Overall
Play VSTick two checkboxes to compare them
| # | Name | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69 | 78 | 72 | 57 | 48 | 85 | 76 | ||
| 2 | 60 | 51 | 54 | 57 | 54 | 67 | 79 | ||
| 3 | 59 | 45 | 72 | 51 | 39 | 72 | 72 | ||
| 4 | 58 | 64 | 61 | 64 | 67 | 37 | 54 | ||
| 5 | 57 | 63 | 47 | 60 | 62 | 62 | 45 | ||
| 6 | 57 | 62 | 62 | 66 | 59 | 45 | 45 | ||
| 7 | 51 | 47 | 48 | 50 | 78 | 47 | 35 | ||
| 8 | 50 | 41 | 35 | 43 | 61 | 58 | 64 | ||
| 9 | 48 | 56 | 54 | 59 | 38 | 41 | 42 |
- Mechanics78Laning72Teamfighting57Macro48Consistency85Versatility76
- Mechanics51Laning54Teamfighting57Macro54Consistency67Versatility79
- Mechanics45Laning72Teamfighting51Macro39Consistency72Versatility72
- Mechanics64Laning61Teamfighting64Macro67Consistency37Versatility54
- Mechanics63Laning47Teamfighting60Macro62Consistency62Versatility45
- Mechanics62Laning62Teamfighting66Macro59Consistency45Versatility45
- Mechanics47Laning48Teamfighting50Macro78Consistency47Versatility35
- Mechanics41Laning35Teamfighting43Macro61Consistency58Versatility64
- Mechanics56Laning54Teamfighting59Macro38Consistency41Versatility42
Axis leaders · records
Champion per stat
Overall distribution (9 members)mean 57·median 57
4869
Hover or tap a bar to see who is in it
LCS Mid 2019 ranking at a glance
LCS Mid 2019 compares 9 members across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting. The overall top is Jensen, with an average of 69. In Mechanics, Jensen ranks highest. The overall average here is 57, ranging from 69 down to 48.
Frequently asked questions
- Who is ranked #1 in LCS Mid 2019?
- The overall #1 in LCS Mid 2019 is Jensen, averaging 69.
- How many are compared in LCS Mid 2019?
- 9 entries compared across 6 stats including Mechanics, Laning, Teamfighting.
- Who leads in Mechanics?
- Jensen leads in Mechanics.
- How are these scores calculated?
- Each axis is a percentile within this ranking, averaged from measured match metrics, with sample shrinkage and — for international events — anchoring to the major-league distribution and a strength-of-schedule adjustment. A rank is not a raw metric; the full method is at everystat.ai/clusters/method.